|
HITS 35640 Welcome
to
WWW.FIGHT4SPELLISSY.COM
Tampa Bay CBS 10 Video The
purpose of this web site is to tell the story of what the United States
Government has done to Colonel (Ret) Tom Spellissy. COL
TOM SPELLISSY is a distinguished combat veteran with over 25 years of
dedicated service to the United States Army and this great Nation.
He is personally recognized and credited with saving the lives of
Special Operations Forces, SEALs and Rangers by making decisions at
critical times that could have put his career at great risk if anything
went wrong. He was inducted
into the United States Army 75th Ranger Regiment Hall of Fame
for his work during Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom.
He was also the lead Department of Defense person who assisted Congress
in establishing the National Center for Counter-Terrorism and
Cyber-Crime at Norwich University, Vermont. Colonel Spellissy has wrongfully been convicted of a crime that he did not commit by our justice system. He has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. His wife is recovering from a second major surgery due to her on going battle with Ovarian Cancer. He also has two young children. Our mission is to get the Court to grant a New Trial based on New Evidence; government witness tampering, perjury by key witnesses for the prosecution and passed Polygraph Test by COL Spellissy. IF
YOU WANT TO HELP PLEASE CALL, WRITE OR EMAIL EACH AND EVERY DAY THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION: · YOU KNOW TOM SPELLISSY IS NOT GUILTY. ·
YOU
WILL DO EVERYTHING LAWFUL IN YOUR POWER TO HELP STOP AN INNOCENT MAN
FROM GOING TO PRISON. ·
THAT
YOU WANT THE FOLLOWING PARTIES TO DO THE SAME:
PS.
PLEASE FORWARD THIS FLYER TO AS MANY ·
CONTACT
ALL MEDIA SOURCES AND PLEAD FOR THEIR SUPPORT. ·
FORWARD
THIS INFORMATION TO ANY AND ALL WEBSITES, INCLUDING MY SPACE, ETC. ·
CONTACT
YOUR LOCAL AND STATE POLITICAL REPRESENTITIVES. ·
SOMEONE
PLEASE CREATE A WEBSITE PERTAINING TO THIS ISSUE. |
|||||||||||
|
BRIEF
OF THOMAS SPELLISSY and |
|||||||||||
|
REPLY
BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Ex-Socom Officer Seeks New Conspiracy Trial |
|||||||||||
|
Published:
September 27, 2007 TAMPA - A former U.S. Special Operations Command
official is seeking a new conspiracy trial, claiming the military
prevented a defense witness from testifying at his last trial. Tom Spellissy, a retired Army colonel who headed one of Socom's
most important acquisition offices, was sentenced to 15 months in prison
last year after he claimed he had broken no laws and that the
government's case against him was based on a series of lies. "One day I'm an unsung hero," Spellissy said at his
sentencing hearing, "and the next I'm a criminal. They've killed
me." U.S. District Judge James Whittemore, who also fined Spellissy
$125,000, had allowed him to remain free pending his appeal, which was
rejected by a federal appeals court on Sept. 18. In addition to seeking a new trial, defense attorneys filed a
motion asking that Spellissy's prison sentence be stayed because of
"new evidence." The defense motion alleges witness tampering by the government.
"An unknown senior military officer knowingly persuaded or ordered
Sgt. First Class [Jack] Landers, 75th Ranger Regiment, not to honor the
[defense] subpoena," the defense motion says. Spellissy's trial
attorney, Patrick Doherty, didn't learn of the situation until three
days after the trial concluded, the motion states. Before his retirement from the military in January 2005, Spellissy
started a defense consulting company. William E. Burke, a former
contractor assigned to Socom, was paid $4,500 to give preferential
treatment to Spellissy's clients looking to do business with the
command, government prosecutors charged. Burke pleaded guilty to bribery and received probation after
agreeing to cooperate with prosecutors. Spellissy was charged in an indictment with conspiracy, bribery and
wire fraud. On the witness stand at Spellissy's trial, Burke changed his
story, insisting he and Spellissy were innocent. The jury didn't agree
and convicted Spellissy on all counts in May. In a rare reversal of a jury verdict, however, Whittemore later
overturned the bribery conviction and ordered a new trial on the wire
fraud charges. The judge let the conspiracy conviction stand. Landers would have testified that Burke "was a low-level,
non-decision-making support contractor," the defense motion states.
Because Landers was unavailable to corroborate him, Spellissy chose not
to testify, the motion states. "The defendant's position is that Landers and Spellissy's
testimonies would have corroborated Burke's testimony that no bribery or
conspiracy existed," the motion states. In addition to allegations about the new evidence, the defense
attaches to its pleadings documents that state Spellissy passed a lie
detector test. During that test, Spellissy answered no to the question,
"Did you plan with Bill Burke to defraud the U.S. Government?" Reporter Elaine Silvestrini can be reached at (813) 259-7837 or
esilvestrini@tampatrib.com.
|
|||||||||||
| United States Attorney’s Office | |||||||||||
|
S Mr.
Robert O’Neill Re:
USA vs. Thomas Spellissy & Strategic Defense International, Inc Mr.
O’Neill, This
is a courtesy letter of introduction with the hopes that we may meet and
amicably resolve the “‘Spellissy” matter.
I have known Colonel (Retired) Tom Spellissy and his family since
he and I were in high school. Although
I did not represent Tom at Trial or on his Appeal, myself and Sean Cox are
now representing him Pro Bono. I
know in my heart he has committed no crimes whatsoever and feel that a
“serious miscarriage of justice” has occurred throughout the
investigation, trial and appeal. My sentiment towards Tom Spellissy’s innocence has deepened
since I have reviewed the case and conducted my own investigation. I
have enclosed several documents for your review. Enclosed is the Motion
For a New Trial Based Upon New Evidence and Motion to Stay.
During my investigation I found that Colonel (Ret) Spellissy
cooperated with the Government and would have taken a polygraph if
necessary. Colonel (Ret)
Spellissy took the polygraph at his own expense.
We respectively request that you stipulate to both motions in
question. Also
enclosed is correspondence to Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of the
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman
of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Representative Henry Waxman,
Chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
I am going to ensure that these three representatives provide you
with assistance on obtaining the truth in the evidence, and
conduct an investigation to find out why there was a motivation to
investigate Spellissy for the crimes for which he was charged. As
an Assistant United States Attorney, it is your duty to find the truth.
After reviewing all documents, my opinion is that our justice
system has failed Colonel (Retired) Tom Spellissy.
I don’t believe it was due to any wrong doing on the part of the
prosecution or defense attorneys on this case, but rather, due to a
manipulation by those in power. I
regret that you have never shook Colonel (Ret) Spellissy’s hand and
looked him in the eye. I would like to meet with you and him to discuss
anything you wish, other than classified information.
Thank
you for your anticipated cooperation in this very serious matter. Respectfully, John F. McGuire, Esquire
|
|||||||||||
| Senator Carl Levin | |||||||||||
|
26 September 2007 Senator Carl Levin Subject:
Wrongful Conviction of Colonel (Retired) Thomas Spellissy &
Alleged Witness Tampering by Government Officials Dear Senator Levin, It
was an honor meeting with you on February 21, 2007.
Your stories about the stress of trial work before you went into
Politics were truly inspiring. I am also in the position where the
burden of someone unjustly going to jail is indeed unbearable. We
had previously discussed the injustices that have occurred to Retired
Colonel (Retired) Thomas Spellissy and you were provided documents that
you were to review on the plane ride back to Washington, DC.
I hope you had the opportunity to review them. I
am now representing Colonel (Ret) Spellissy, Pro Bono on the remaining
charge he was convicted of. I have thoroughly reviewed this case. As a result, I have filed a motion for a new trial based on
new evidence and it is enclosed for your review.
The
purpose for this letter is to formally request that you take action in
this “serious miscarriage of justice.” I unfortunately believe that Government officials have
tampered with witnesses in this case.
Coincidently, they are some of the same personnel involved in the
Corporal Pat Tillman fratricide case. The
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is obviously, as you said, the
most powerful investigative committee in the country.
Colonel (Ret) Spellissy has not done anything wrong.
You should also know that he passed a Polygraph Test.
To make matters worse, his wife is battling ovarian cancer most
likely from the stress of these legal proceedings.
Colonel (Ret) Spellissy is a combat veteran with over 25 years of
distinguished service whom was inducted into the United States Army’s
75th Ranger Regiment Hall of Fame for his work supporting the
Rangers during Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. To send him to
prison for 15 months for an alleged crime that he did not commit is a
travesty. As lawyer and
personal friend of Colonel (Retired) Spellissy, I feel I should do
everything ethically possible to over turn this case and ensure that
this never happens again. Colonel
(Retired) Spellissy, his wife Donna and I would like to meet with you in
Washington as soon as conveniently possible to discuss this matter.
Respectfully,
John McGuire, Esquire
|
|||||||||||
| Senator Patrick Leahy | |||||||||||
|
26
September 2007 Senator Patrick
Leahy Subject: Wrongful
Conviction of Colonel (Retired) Thomas Spellissy & Alleged Witness
Tampering by Government Officials Dear Senator Leahy, I
am representing Colonel (Ret) Thomas Spellissy, Pro Bono on the
remaining charge he was convicted of. I have thoroughly reviewed this case. As a result, I have filed a motion for a new trial based on
new evidence and it is enclosed for your review.
The
purpose for this letter is to formally request you take action in this
“serious miscarriage of justice.” I unfortunately believe that Government officials have
tampered with witnesses in this case.
Coincidently, they are some of the same personnel involved in the
Corporal Pat Tillman fratricide case. Colonel
(Ret) Spellissy has not done anything wrong.
You should also know that he passed a Polygraph Test.
To make matters worse, his wife is battling ovarian cancer most
likely from the stress of these legal proceedings.
Colonel (Ret) Spellissy is a combat veteran with over 25 years of
distinguished service whom was inducted into the United States Army’s
75th Ranger Regiment Hall of Fame for his work supporting the
Rangers during Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. To send him to
prison for 15 months for an alleged crime that he did not commit is a
travesty. As lawyer and
personal friend of Colonel (Retired) Spellissy, I feel I should do
everything ethically possible to overturn this case and ensure that this
never happens again. You
may recall that when Colonel (Retired) Spellissy was on active duty he
assisted your office in establishing the National Center for
Counter-Terrorism and Cyber-Crime at Norwich University, Vermont. Colonel
(Retired) Spellissy, his wife Donna and I would like to meet with you in
Washington as soon as conveniently possible to discuss this matter.
Respectfully,
|
|||||||||||
| Representative Henry Waxman | |||||||||||
|
26
September 2007 Representative
Henry Waxman Subject:
Wrongful Conviction of Colonel (Retired) Thomas Spellissy &
Alleged Witness Tampering by Government Officials Representative
Henry Waxman, I
am representing Colonel (Ret) Spellissy, Pro Bono on the remaining
charge he was convicted of. I
have thoroughly reviewed this case.
As a result, I have filed a motion for a new trial based on new
evidence and it is enclosed for your review. The
purpose for this letter is to formally request you take action in this
“serious miscarriage of justice.” I unfortunately believe that Government officials have
tampered with witnesses in this case.
Coincidently, they are some of the same personnel involved in the
Corporal Pat Tillman fratricide case, specifically, the former commander
of the United Special Operations Command, General Bryan “Doug” Brown. Colonel
(Ret) Spellissy has not done anything wrong.
You should also know that he passed a Polygraph Test.
To make matters worse, his wife is battling ovarian cancer most
likely from the stress of these legal proceedings.
Colonel (Ret) Spellissy is a combat veteran with over 25 years of
distinguished service whom was inducted into the United States Army’s
75th Ranger Regiment Hall of Fame for his work supporting the
Rangers during Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. To send him to
prison for 15 months for an alleged crime that he did not commit is a
travesty. As lawyer and
personal friend of Colonel (Retired) Spellissy, I feel I should do
everything ethically possible to overturn this case and ensure that this
never happens again. Colonel
(Retired) Spellissy, his wife Donna and I would like to meet with you in
Washington as soon as conveniently possible to discuss this matter.
Respectfully, LETTERS and LINKS |
|||||||||||
| Motion for a New Trial based on ProsMiscond,IAC&NE | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 1, March 9, 2005 DCIS Report | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 2, DCIS Letter to USSOCOM | |||||||||||
| Exhibit_3,_April_15,_2005_DCIS_Report | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 4, Highsmith Statement | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 5, April 13, 2005 DCIS Report | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 6, DCIS_Document_January_25,_2006 | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 7, Motion for Downward Departure-Burke | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 8, Snellgrove Statement | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 9, Santa Lucia Statement | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 10, Uhler Statement | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 11, Email from LTC Weir, USSOCOM lawyer to Trial Defense Counsel | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 12, Don Jones Sworn Testimony | |||||||||||
| Exhibit 13, Spellissy Affidavit for PM&IAC | |||||||||||
| Renewed Motion to Suppress | |||||||||||
| James Rooney Affidavit | |||||||||||
| OCTOBER 25, 2007 Notice for No-Opposition | |||||||||||
| Motion to strike the government response in oppostition final | |||||||||||
| Motion for New Trial | |||||||||||
| Exhibit A USASOC Letter on Landers | |||||||||||
| Exhibit B Poly Test | |||||||||||
| Motion for stay of Sentence pending Motion for a New Trial based on New Evidence | |||||||||||
| Letter For Community Service | |||||||||||
| Spellissy Letter | |||||||||||
| Govt's Exhibit A to Motion Quash Subps for Mtn Supp | |||||||||||
| Gov'sAFFIDAVITwith the true corrections | |||||||||||
| JudgeditchesconvictionsinSOComcase-7JulStPeteTimes | |||||||||||
| MtnforJudgmentofAcquittal-NewTrl | |||||||||||
| Addendum to Motion for New Trial Based on New Evidence | |||||||||||
| Exhibit A to the Addendum to Motion for a New Trial Based on New Evidence | |||||||||||
| Butler Affidavit | |||||||||||
| Spellissy Affidavit | |||||||||||
| Addendum to Motion for Stay of Sentence Pending Motion for a New Trial Based on New Evidence | |||||||||||
| Letter from Erik Eriksen | |||||||||||
| Letter to James Whittemore from Colonel Matthew J. Brown | |||||||||||
| Letter to James Whittemore from Christopher T. Ullrich | |||||||||||
| Letter to James Whittemore from Wesley F. Walters | |||||||||||
| Letter to James Whittemore from JEFFREY C. LIEB | |||||||||||
| Letter to James Whittemore from John K. Slattery | |||||||||||
| Letter from Robert L. Vasta | |||||||||||
| Letter from Alan D. Westfield | |||||||||||
| Letter from Kerry Adams | |||||||||||
| Speech from Dr. Uhler | |||||||||||
| http://www.west-point.org/class/usma1979/spellissy.php | |||||||||||
| http://www.sptimes.com/2006/04/19/Hillsborough/Warrant_in_SOCom_case.shtml | |||||||||||
| http://www2.tbo.com/content/2007/oct/05/ex-socom-official-claims-civilian-courts-cant-judg/?news-breaking | |||||||||||